All right, ladies and gentlemen, we're getting started with a live airing of surreal politics. And if you are on either of those radio stations of OSA, you have not been worried about because it's real politics. We're not going to be cursing up a storm here today, which we, you know, sometimes we do that on the other show, but not here. You know, when we do it here, it's by accident, you know, so when we go ahead, we'll get our video streams beginning, we'll go ahead start those video streams and we'll go make sure that they're working because you know what, we do everything right around here, but we are not everybody and not everybody does things quite as well as we do, you know, sometimes these people, they have things up, oh, you thought I was going to say it, didn't you? No, not me. I'm not going to say that F word. I don't do it on here. I'm not going to be apologizing for any F's tonight, ladies and gentlemen. I'm doing the right thing. Sure. Yeah, of course they're working and the audio and the video they synced up because we're professional broadcasters unlike all those other guys and so rumble is going to play a couple advertisements or 10. So we'll just let them go ahead do that because you know, they've got to go, they got to go make money. And so, you know, they'll do that and then eventually they'll allow us to start our show, you know, that's the idea behind it anyway. I mean, whether or not they do, that's another question, right? And so we'll see if that, you know, we'll see how that works out. Anyway, we'll go ahead start the local recording. And then the local recording will be done. And then once we see that and then of course, as you would expect and of course, yeah, we're on rumble. Yeah, yeah, of course, you know, they just had to play 10 advertisements for a start our show, you know, because it's rumble, you see. And you know, they're that YouTube competitor that's, it's totally different. It's totally different thing. And so anyway, now that we know that everything's working, ladies and gentlemen, except for GoMTV, they don't, they don't really work over there, you know, they have like, I don't know, they got a different definition of function, I think. It's kind of the idea over at GoMTV. So anyway, I think that they'll start working eventually. And that's good for that, you know, that way, you know, that way they can start, they could have, they could have shows on their network and stuff. And so we'll just go ahead and we'll play some intro music, why don't we? And welcome to surreal, full of teams on January 29, 2024 be in the current year. This is the 44th episode of stage wasn't foreseeable. And of course, what ain't these days? Fox News is in full what propaganda mode? Airing the worst of their senior military analyst and strategic analyst. And likes of Lindsey Graham and whatnot. In calls for the United States to make World War III more or less official by attacking Iran. This comes on the heels of a drone strike on a US military base in Jordan near the Syrian border. So you got to, you got to keep track of all the countries involved here because it's the World War III thing. You see, and it left three dad and many more injured as you might expect a drone strike to do on a military base. The United States government has not the slightest idea who launched the attack, of course, but they're capable of asserting that despite this uncertainty, they know it was in a roundback group. And that's an awfully convenient circumstance for those persons and entities that have been looking for any excuse to get us into Iran since prior to September 11, 2001 and have scarcely taken the time to put down their war drum since. Of course, it's hardly unforeseeable that soldiers in and near a war zone at a time when regional conflicts are escalating out of control would be attacked. For the sane observer, it becomes clear that the purpose of the military base is for it to be attacked. It's not there for any other purpose than to act as bait to find excuses to wage wars. Is there some better purpose for this particular military base? I don't know. I imagine that somebody would try to articulate one if they were under oath in front of Congress and it probably not be credible, but it is obvious that this is a part of American military strategy. It is obvious that when you are involved in an increasing number of military conflicts in a region that your forces in that region will be attacked. It's kind of the whole point of warfare. It's about as it were. So while my inclination is to support my own country and there's a war and I certainly don't want American troops getting hurt or killed, the fainting, shocking, consequent outrage that this occurred is just nauseating to watch. It's not plausible. The Iran Hawks have tried to make their case and failed over and over and over again. They have come up with one excuse after another for decades and the public, surprisingly enough is not falling for this particular line. They fall for a lot, but not this one. It's that stupid. They keep on antagonizing matters in the region, calling anyone who questions their wisdom and anti-Semite, sure assign that you're telling the truth and have demonstrated the most consistent aversion to rational analysis of any interest group and that's really something. Considering the aversion to rational analysis that goes on with interest groups in American politics, you see. If a bomb goes off for somebody slips on a banana peel, they're called for an attack on Iran. It's cartoonish and stupid and an insult to the intelligence of the population. The way to protect American service members from attack is fairly straightforward. Only deploy them to those places where you could admit the plan is for them to be attacked and arrange for them to be the ones doing the attacking. This idea that our military is just sitting around mining their own business in a foreign country and that all attacks on them or Iranian aggression is not a serious proposal. There's no reason for our military to be minding their own business in a foreign country. If they are there, they should have a purpose that does not involve mining their own business. 2176881433, you like to be on the program and the more you told the less I have to use it, please, to give us a call. I'm really like, I'm bent out of shape about this as you might expect. I do not, it's not that I have any sympathy for Iran, certainly, and not the hootie rebels or whatever stupid calls that they have behind them. I'm just so sick and tired of these people trying to drag us into every stupid damn conflict. No Odyssey notification again, link their early PM then check back a couple of minutes before showtime gone. Annoying but back up again, weird, all swell that and swell though. Yeah, Odyssey doesn't work. It's a trick. You see, the whole point of Odyssey is to get us to use it and to think that we have a video streaming platform so that we get screwed. That's the whole point of Odyssey, I think. Pretty sure that that's the reason Odyssey exists. It's controlled opposition. The whole entire point of it is to screw us over. If it works, then that's going to defeat the purpose of the enterprise. They don't want that to happen. I posted to some of the socials right before the show today that we've got a new feature. It's actually existed with the call and system for a long time. I just haven't used it. I don't know how much, I don't know if we will continue to use it by the way. You can use your web browser to call into the show. If you want to try to do this, it's callinstudio.com slash show slash SPM. I'll start putting that link in the show descriptions. I didn't do it today. I don't know if we're going to keep that though because as soon as it starts, I blocked private calls. You can't call using the Star Six 7 or whatever. Usually what I do here is I screen using call or ID. If you want to try to use the web interface you can, if I start getting abusive calls from that thing, I'm going to have to disable it. That's probably going to happen at some point. For now, you have that option. CallinStudio.com slash show slash SPM will allow you to call here without using your phone. Caller, you are on surreal politics. What can I do for you today? Hey, Chris. Yeah, I mean, this story about what's going on with Iran is crazy. It's not totally surprising, but it did come out of nowhere, I guess, in a way. What do you think about the reports? Originally, the cry was, oh, it was the US-based in Jordan, which the big thing about that was that this is a neutral country. This is ally. How did they attack us there? Then Jordanian representatives of the government came out and said, no, this space is not actually in Jordan. I'm assuming they said this because they didn't want to get dragged into the conflict at all. The base was actually in Syria because it was right on the border. I think maybe to the uninformed observer, that maybe seems like a distinction without a difference. I think why it matters is because Syria has been embroiled in conflict for a while now, and to be struck in Syria, they attack bases in Syria all the time. The US really shouldn't be there because the public has not wanted us to be involved in Syria for years now. Do you think that there's any truth to this that it didn't actually be placed in Jordan if it's actually the fact that Syria or do you think the Jordanians are just putting that out there because they're trying to disemce from being involved? I heard it said today, and I haven't checked the veracity of this. Jordan does not want to admit that the base is there. They say that Jordan does not disclose this base. That was something that somebody on Fox News said today. I did not verify this claim. Whether it's a hundred feet this side or a hundred feet that side of the Syrian border, I don't know that it's the most pertinent thing except to the Jordanian government. If the Jordanian government is like, hey, you've got this military base here, guys are attacking it. I don't want anything to do with it. They might just seed the territory to Syria. They'll be like, here's Syria. Would you like this American military base? You can have it. I don't know. I don't have any way to verify that claim. That's my limited understanding of it. But Fox News has been lying to me all day. What the hell do I know? Fox News is like, taking Lindsey Graham and every idiot who's like, oh, well, Joe Biden's biggest problem is that we're not a war with Iran yet. I'm like, well, wait a second. I think that Joe Biden might have screwed some things up other than not going to war with Iran, Lindsey Graham. These people are completely out of their minds. All you can discern from watching them talk is that they are bad people. I really just don't know. Yeah, I was watching you oddly enough. I caught Fox News segment yesterday. I can't remember the guy's name, but he was like some kind of Colonel or something that he likes to give Fox News military advice from time to time. He was basically saying things that were eerily similar to what I remember people saying right before we invaded Iraq, talking about, oh, we need to lead the way and do what we have to do. We should ask our allies to join us, but if they don't join us, let them know. We're going to remember who's with us and who's against us. We need to strike swiftly and hard. They start quoting Teddy Roosevelt, the carrot dickstick, and speaks awfully. I saw the exact segment you're talking about. I know what you're saying. You know, I went on. No, this guy went on war mongering and it was eerily similar to right before we went to the war in Iraq. But I mean, things have changed obviously. I don't know if we have the ability to wage a war like a serious one with the, like I don't think that the public has got any taste for whatsoever. I'm like, what was going on in 2001 and 2004? I don't know. What do you think? Do you think that they're going to actually be able to pull something off? I mean, how does the Biden administration respond? I mean, there's definitely political pressure, you know, not just public, but within the, within the halls of power, there's definitely pressure to do something serious here. How do you see it going? Well, that segment was pretty funny, right? So he's talking to Arthel Neville. It's like the black female weekend host, right? And she is talking to this guy as if she knows what she's talking about. And it's obvious that she doesn't. She's been fed these things, right? She's like, oh, and so, you know, how bad, I don't remember the exact questions that she was asking, but they were preposterous and they were, and they were, they were obviously questions that he was expecting to answer, right? You know, it was, it was to the effect of, so, you know, how, how fast should America attack Iran or something? You know, it's just, you know, it was this day, this layup of like, yeah, well, we all understand that we have to go to war with Iran. So why don't you just go ahead and tell us about how awesome that's going to be for the American people, you know? And so I watched the exact segment you're talking about. And it's like, nobody, I, what the big joke about the Iran thing is, is that like I said in the introduction today, it's like, they've been trying to do this since before September 11, 2001. And, and the public is not buying it. I don't know, I don't know what makes the, you know, the American population immune to a Iranian war propaganda, but they're just not buying it. And it's conspicuous how badly they failed to make the case, right? They just keep on saying like, we just really need to go to war with Iran, like every stupid thing. If somebody slips on a banana peel, we've got to go to war with Iran. And America is like, you guys are crazy. Like I have no idea what's going on in Iran. Every time something happens that you say we've got to go attack Iran, it's often some place that I didn't even know we had soldiers at. What are you talking about? Why would I do this? Right? And so the thing is that they, they understand. They understand full well that, you know, getting us into a war with Iran is going to be politically unpopular. The question is, you know, how much do they care about that? And, you know, and when they're running around telling you that they're going to, you know, transgender your kids and throw you in prison for questioning the wisdom of that, you know, you have to figure that they're not actually that concerned about elections. And so it's tough to say, but I have my doubts that Joe Biden will actually do it, right? Like I think that he'll probably go and launch a bunch of missiles, you know, at things that Iran cares about. I have my doubts that there will be strikes, American military strikes on Iranian territory. I think that that is exceedingly unlikely. I think that you will see the United States military strike things that are of significant interest to Iran. And then that will be, you know, this ratcheting up of tensions even further. And the question is, how far can you ratchet up the tensions before the dam rubber band snaps is what it becomes, right? Because, you know, that's what everybody's really fundamentally trying to do. They're trying to like, everybody wants to get right up to the line and then not do it. And then somebody's going to accidentally go open a line and all hell is going to break loose, you know? Yeah, I mean, the people that hold power in this country want this to happen, like you point out they've wanted it to happen for decades. And I mean, things are going on in Israel right now and different, you know, Iranian proxies are, you know, kind of like messing with Israel and the North of Israel, keeping it so that, you know, they're struggling with their ground war in Gaza and they're having a lot of problems. And it's almost like they kind of want us to get involved, you know, more directly in that conflict. And that seems to be what's being, you know, what they're trying to draw out here. But I don't know how terrible it is. I mean, we have so many fires going on around the world right now. The recruitment is at rock bottom, no one wants to fight for this country. Our stockpiles have been being sent to Ukraine and we're low. We don't have, you know, war mobilization in terms of production going on in the west at this point. It wouldn't be hard to launch, like you said, a bunch of missiles that I ran, but like actually doing something that's going to make the Iranian stop, you know, picking at Israel. I don't see how we could do that. So I don't know, like it's just like I don't see the end game strategy here. But we're trying to accomplish by doing that because if we're not in a place where we get actually like conquer Iran, like Iran's a very difficult country to invade. You couldn't conquer it with ground troops. We're not in a place to be able to do it. I just don't like it's just like madness like trains off the tracks on this. Well, you know, that's the thing, right? And so the question always, you know, comes back to are the people who are calling the shots in the United States at all interested in the survival of the United States. And you know, the evidence seems to be that they're not. Right? So like if Joe Biden is like, well, I'd really like to be president of this country and command a very large economy and be in charge of the world's largest military. Then he's like, okay, well, I better not wreck this thing, you know? But if he's like, no, like, you know, my whole entire point is to destroy America for China than, you know, then that's a whole different story. Then you go into Iran and you're like, okay, we're going in there hard and fast. We're throwing everything we've got at this. And then it all gets destroyed and then and then try to get to rule the world for the next 250 years, right? It's kind of the idea. Now, you know, I have my, I have my doubts that they're going to go that far with it. But, you know, the, you know, the, the, here's, here's what I would love somebody to do. And there's not nobody's going to do it. But I'd love to see a press conference, whether with Lloyd Austin or with, what's the other guy from the defense department, John Kirby. Okay. So you understand you have, you can tell us that it's not that you don't know what group it is, but you know that they were Iranian back. Whatever it is you have, that it's not a false flag. And then he would just be like your conspiracy theorist Alex Jones recharge, which means that he has no evidence at all that it's not a false flag, right? And then you ask, okay, who would benefit from this? And if the answer is very clear, it would be Israel, right? And then you'd have to ask the question, you know, is it beneath the dignity of the array of Israelis to attack American troops? And the answer to that is definitely no, right? The answer to that question is definitely no. It's definitely not beneath their dignity to do that. We know about that from the USS Liberty. And so, you know, that's not going to impact American foreign policy decisions very clearly because, you know, they, it's a good possibility. They would know about it, right? They'd be like, hey, Joe Biden be like, look, I can't get involved in this. Boy that you're having. And he'd be like, well, what do we have to, how would, how would, what would it take to get you into this war? He's like, well, if American soldiers were killed at like a military base, but we, you know, obviously nobody's going to be stupid enough to do that. And then the Israelis would be like, well, you know, I know a guy, you know, and, and so like, you know, these things could happen. But they're not going to go in and try to like topple the, they're not going to go in with ground forces and try to, you know, and try to take over the government of Iran, right? What they'll do is they'll go and they'll just launch missiles into the country and break things, right? And that's, you know, that would be something that they would do. And then the question is, what is Iran going to do about that? And I think that the people in Washington believe that the answer's not a whole lot, right? They'll do exactly what they're doing now, which is funding, you know, paramilitary groups. And if they're already doing that, then Washington says, what, you know, I don't have much to lose by pissing off Iran. Now do I, right? You know, and so I think that that's a pretty good, I think that you could say with certainty that they'll go and attack Iranian interests outside of Iranian soil. There's a non-zero chance that they've lob missiles into Iran. The possibility of them launching an invasion of the country, I would say that that's as close to zero as you can get. And what they get for that, what they get for launching the missiles in there is, well, first of all, they get to buy the missiles from their friends. Their friends love that, right? Their friends love when you buy those, you know, missiles that cost more than you'll make it a lifetime and then blow them up and then buy some more. They love that stuff and they'll give you campaign contributions and they'll let you screw kids on an island and stuff. They're all for it. So there's that and then there's the blackmailers, right? There's those guys that, you know, that is really company that puts the spyware on the phones of the people who are in charge, right? The Pegasus stuff. And then they're like, look, we have these videos that you've been, you know, you're dumb enough to do this with your phone. You know, and those kids, they really not looking like they're having a good time. So, you know, you better do what we say. You know, and so, you know, those are the things that they have. It's not something, you know, it's not like nobody's under the impression that business in the best interest of the United States. What the hell do we have? Why do we have a base in a Jordan or on Syrian border? Whichever side of the border it's on. What are we doing over there? Absolutely nothing positive. Nothing that you're going to benefit from for sure. And so, we're like, okay, we'll just, we'll, you know, we'll go over there. You guys go have a war and then we're like, oh, you guys are a bunch of hoody rebels. We'll go on some missiles at you. We'll go, oh, you know, Israel's going in like ethnically cleansing Palestine. We'll go sense of nuclear carriers there just in case somebody, you know, gets upset about the, you know, that, well, you know, the Holocaust is a trademark thing. But you know, your little ethnic cleansing exercise, you know, you know, whatever it is, there's, excuse me, you know, who gains what? I mean, these are people looking out for their own interests. They're not looking out for the interests of the United States, obviously. Yeah, yeah, for sure. I mean, we brought up, I mentioned Russia Ukraine before and then you brought China. I mean, do you foresee either one of them at least rhetorically starting to, like if the US starts to get aggressive with Iran, then coming out and, you know, trying to make us look bad on the world stage, you know, the same way we would anybody else. I don't know if we're at a point where those countries could do that yet, but that would be interesting to see how they might try to handle that from a geopolitical perspective. Well, what they, what, you know, what they try to make us look bad? Well, yeah, they'd certainly try to make us look bad, you know, to, you know, how do they go about doing that? Right? That's certain, right? You know, if Russia sees an opportunity to embarrass the United States at this juncture, you know, that's the, you know, that's a cheap way of dealing with their problems, right? You know, China, I say, you know, China's a little bit more, I don't know, diplomatic say, you know, Russia's literally at war with us. So like they have, they have nothing to lose by, you know, souring diplomatic relations, say, except that maybe they're hoping that they'll get a better arrangement when Trump becomes president. It's the only, that's the only question about that, I'd say. You know, they think that Joe Biden is going to be president for another four years. Then, you know, Vladimir Putin can't go wrong and take us off, you know, but, you know, what, you know, how would, how would they react to it? I mean, my understanding, you know, the, the United States government keeps on saying that, Iran has been providing drones to Russia or something, you know, whether that's true or not, who knows, but it's not, it's not implausible that Iran would be willing to do it, say. And then, you know, if Iran is going to be involved in a military conflict, is, you know, is Russia going to help them? I'd say probably, you know, I don't think that Russia's going to go and get into a nuclear standoff with the United States over it, but can they send them things that the United States doesn't want to send them at them to be sent and make, you know, all types of trouble that way? Yeah, yeah, they would certainly do that. I'm sure China already is the extent that they could do it under the table. And so they'll just do it above the table and be like, yeah, you know, look, we're pretty sick of the United States being at war with every country in the world. Okay, guys, like cut it out. We're going to sell things to who we want. You guys might want to stop with the, you know, world war thing because eventually, you know, you tick off enough people and, you know, it might, might come back to bite you. And so, but they would definitely, you know, they'll definitely try to make us look bad if we're, you know, invade another country, you know, and they won't have much difficulty doing it, I'd say. Yeah, I mean, I'm really interested to see how it all plays out. I mean, I think it's even if they can get away with it, even if our ran can't directly hurt the United States, in a way back that's like equitable. I think that burning political capital for this, like, I don't know, I guess call it regime that rules. It is, you know, whatever they do that that benefits us in a political sense. So I think that that's a good thing. So it's probably going to take a while, like let them burn all the capital. And I think more perspective, like what we could do is, you know, talk to people in our lives that are same people that we have relationships with and just say, like you said, work, why do we have a base there? Why are we even there in the first place? Like, you know, I thought we were, I thought we said we didn't want to go to Syria and like, get that to be the talking point with people so that they're just like, I don't want anything to do with this. I want to come, I want our troops to come home. I thought we had it already done that and make it so that they cannot gin up any kind of energy for war. They cannot gin up any kind of energy for support of the system doing these things. And I think that's the best thing we could do politically on our end. Yeah, but now I mean, great opening monologue. Very interested to see how this plays out and thanks for taking my call. Thank you very much for making a call, my friend. 217-688-1433. You like to be on the program and I'm more or you told the less I have to. So please do give us a call. Let's see here. Let's go pull up some of these stories here. Let's see. I, you know, I actually haven't, this is a new headline at revolver. Okay, so I pulled up a bunch of stories about this, but this sounds interesting. So I'm going to read it cold and we'll find out what happens. This says Tucker reacts to Lindsey Graham's push for war with Iran by drama again, F bomb on his head now when he gets to drop it at F bomb. I'm going to, uh, you know what, I'll do something else other than say F bomb. I don't know. I'll do either. You know, either that or maybe like, uh, Hey, Lindsey Graham, why don't you get your head out of your, you know, we'll figure it, we'll figure out some way to deal with that. I'm not trying to, I'm not trying to curse on, um, on surreal politics. We're better behave than that around here, okay? So, there we go. Sadly, more Americans have paid the prize for Joe Biden's terrible and in that leadership, but with their lives. At this point, with Joe in charge, who needs enemies, three US troops are now dead and dozens more hurt from a riding back drone strike that took place in Jordan near the Syrian border. And right on cue, the usual ride-os are out there. It's in the start world war three for their defense contractor buddies and donors. Tucker Carlson is all too familiar with his worn out war monger script. He's not letting them off the hook now. Meanwhile, the propaganda media is busy making excuses for Biden's blunder that misguided move of sending billions to a rogue terrorist nation, the naively believing they wouldn't use it against us. We're literally paying foreign terrorists to attack and humiliate us. According from Reuters, three US service members were killed and dozens may be wounded after an unmanned aerial drone attack on US forces stationed in the northeast Jordan near the Syrian border. President Joe Biden, US military officials said on Sunday. Biden blamed Iran back groups for the attack, the first deadly strike against US forces since the Israel-Homos War erupted in October and sent the shock waves through the Middle East. Now, here's a funny thing. I left my, my, my, my Heinehof today. When, no, I'm kidding. I still have it. I'm sitting on it right now. I left like crazy when they said this. This is the first attack on US service members since the Israel-Homos attack on October 7th. Are you trying to tell me that other, the attack on Israel is an attack on US forces? Is that what you mean to say Reuters? Because that's, that's a problem, you know. Israel is actually not part of the United States. They checked. You get, you get, I know wiki piti is like not a very good source, but you can go check it there like dead their own country and stuff. Like you could go like day, you check the source material and like, you know, the other place will tell you to and they're not even like, it's not like, it's not like one of these things where they link it to, you know, the Huffington Post, like real sources. What we are still gathering the facts of this attack, we know it was carried out by radical Iran-backed militant groups operating in Syria and Iraq by sending a statement. Oh, so they're operating in, you know, one of two countries or maybe both of them, you know, somewhere in this region there's somebody who received money from this country. And even though we don't know who they are, you know, we know where their money comes from. So we're going to get into World War Three now. I have no doubt we will hold those responsible to account at a time in a matter of our choosing. He said, that's not a very good Joe Biden impression. Joe Biden doesn't speak with that much force, you know. Joe Biden's an idiot and he doesn't talk very good. So it's difficult for a talented speaker like me to do a Joe Biden impression because I'm like, what's most shocking is that Lloyd Austin decided to clock into work, but he has another kicker that Iran-backed drone strike happened right after Joe Biden claimed Iran wouldn't dare attack the United States. That's pretty funny. And they got a tweet here from John Hassan, Biden two weeks ago, I've already delivered the message to Iran, they know not to do anything. Today, Iran, but drone strike killed three us every member, many wounded. Well, it looks like Joe missed the mark on yet another one. What's new? Once more, Joe Biden's staggering ineptitude leads to dead Americans. Ineptitude, this is a classic case with a pot calling the kettle black, everything they blame Trump for, they're actually doing themselves. Well, if they were, you know, if the Democrats call you black, they're just trying to get your vote. I don't know what you're talking about. In January 2020, candidate Joe Biden attacked President Trump by accusing him of recklessly staring the US towards war with Iran. Everything they accused Trump of, they do themselves. Donald Trump is dangerously incompetent and incapable of world leadership. The reckless disregard for the consequences that would surely follow was dangerously incompetent. It put the US in a rod on a collision course. That's another bad Joe Biden pressure. I'm sorry. The comments were made in response to Trump taking out Iran's revolutionary guard commander, Kassam Soleimani, a decision with which Joe Biden, of course, disagreed. Now with attacks on US troops in Jordan by Iranian backed proxy militias, calls for direct conflict with Tehran or erupting on both sides of the political aisle. The Obama Biden-Kapal has funded Iran with billions that finance anti-US militias all over the Middle East. It didn't have to be this way. Of course it did. I'm not saying that, you know, it's a very good idea to like give money to Iran. I, you know, we got like some money over here and be like, hey, you guys are you guys are on, you Iran guys like our money, right? Yeah, sucks for you. We've got money. You don't. You guys should probably, you know, not be cavemen or whatever. And right on chill, GOP establishment is wasting no time beating their war drums. Rhino Lindsey Graham is out front and center with another Rhino John Corden right on his heels. Tucker Carlson caught on to their saber rattling and let loose a scorching F bomb right at those two lunatics. And so, uh, Tucker Carlson on Twitter says, in lunatics, let's try that again. Tucker Carlson on Twitter says, in lunatics, Tucker Carlson on Twitter says, in lunatics, you get the idea, okay? So, so hit Iran now, hit them hard, was what Lindsey Graham said. Senator John Corden says target terror on, Tucker Carlson takes screenshots of those two things. And he says, Gaggity in lunatics. Spot on Tucker Lindsey Graham and his crotes are quick to send your children to die in a foreign land so that they could fatten their wallets and keep their defense contractor donors happy. Meanwhile, the newest Biden foreign policy plunder highlights, chose outrageous incompetence. And, uh, let's see your mic Baker on how Iran, now Biden reversing transpolities with Iran led to the mess we are in today. And of course, you know, they'll just say the, the opposite thing, right? They'll go, what our problem is from a US perspective and our allies perspective is that the Biden administration currently, um, won't address the primary driver of all this, which is Iran, right? So, the Iranians made the calculation, the regime, not the people with the history of Iran's fantastic. And the people who great, but it's the regime and the RGC, the revolutionary garcore, they know because they've been doing this for a long time, that they can continue to destabilize the region. And they're not going to be paying for it directly, right? Any, any response is going to be directed at one of their proxies. Right. So, that was, that was a calculation that had made. The Biden administration is, playing that out for sure. You know, they early on in the conflict, they didn't want to talk about Iran. Right. Now, they've at least mentioned it obliquely. This designation that you raised is interesting because President Trump did designate them as a foreign terrorist organization. You've got different levels of designation, right? When you, when you say, okay, that group, Hamas or that group over there, we want to designate them as terrorists. You can, you can do that at various levels and it has different impacts in terms of what actions can then be taken against the group. So, the Trump administration listed the, who, these as foreign terrorist organization, and then Trump in February of 21, or sorry, Biden when he came in, so it was February of 2021. Reverse that decision. And he reversed it because the UN and others were saying, oh, this is terrible. You know, you can't keep them on the terrorists. Let's because it's hurting, you know, Yemen, it's hurting the people of Yemen. And you know, they're not getting humanitarian aid and, and well, you know, most of that humanitarian aid was getting right from through by the, by the Hootsies anyway. Right. It sounds exactly like what's happened with Hamas and with Hezbollah. Exactly. That's exactly right. Yeah. Hamas is, the leadership is rich because of all the billions that they control when money and aid goes into Gaza. Right. They've been, so anyway, but with the, with the Hootsies, the, the Biden administration had no choice. I think from an optic from, for politics, they realized, okay, we now have to reverse our own decision. So now they've this week. Oh, they had no choice now. Then, yes. Do you think then the idea was, well, Trump did it, so we're just going to reverse it like everything else. Yeah. I think like everything else, the border decisions, you know, that they took on the border, it's ridiculous, right? But it was that idea that like, well, Trump did it. It must have been bad. Yeah. And so let's, let's just change it all because that'll show how righteous we are. Right. So they did that with the Hootsies. And now, now they've decided to go and reverse their thinking because they have no choice. Right. I mean, the news, the media has finally picked up on this and said, okay, there's a lot going on here. And we're being targeted. It's only a matter of time, you know, before something bad happens. And then, so I think they wanted to get ahead of it a little bit, right? And so what they've done is they haven't gone with the foreign terrorist organization designation. They went with a lesser designation, which is especially designated global terrorist. Right. So whatever that is, that's an acronym. I'm sure it's a government acronym SGDT. Right. So that is still important. You know, don't get me wrong. I'm glad they did it. But it's not the strongest that they could do the action that they could take against the Hootsies. So what they've done here is they're saying, okay, you know, we're going to designate you as terrorists. You're we're going to call you terrorists. But and that can allow us to freeze assets in to a degree. But they still allows for humanitarian aid to go in. Again, the problem is if it goes into Haudailles, if it goes into the port, main port there in Yemen, that's controlled by the Hootsies. So humanitarian aid, you know, whether it gets to the actual people who deserve it, need it, etc. Just like with the citizens of Gaza. Yeah. Yeah. Is anybody's guess? All right. Welcome back to surreal politics. Sorry about that. And so over at revolver, they say he's right. Trump kept Iran in check with strength and smart negotiation tactics. But Biden, he handed them billions and naively hoped that they wouldn't turn against us. His glueless is now beyond belief and it's costing lives. It's curious, I'd say, that like revolver news, trying to figure out what their bit is, you know, they are not journalists. They're they're not honest either. They link to sites that like are plainly obviously dishonest. I don't tend to read to you from them. But you know, you've heard me talk about like headline USA is like a fake news site, like an unapologetically fake news site. It is just it's not even trying to like be plausible, right? It's fake news. And it, you know, that the name right there tells you, they're like believe that we're news. Look, we're American. But it's just some guy who who really he's not honest, right? And revolver links to that guy. So like, you know, they did that for a reason and it's not because he has credible reporting, right? They have a relationship with this guy and he's going to paint things a certain way that they want them painted, right? And they're using that as a way to do it. So they're like, yeah, well, you know, Trump was so good on Iran by striking killing the general, you know, I don't care. Like fine, go ahead, kill the jail. I don't care about Iran. Like, it's not it's not my concern for the Iranian people. Believe me when I tell you, but it's actually not America first to get into a war with Iran, right? It's it this is Israeli foreign policy and it's unambiguously Israeli foreign policy. We keep hearing about who's the rebels, who's the rebel? So like, like, you know, who the rebel ever scream a law who walk bar and like blow up your house? No, like they're not these are not the people who are crashing their cars into crowds of people in America and Europe, right? That's not what this is. That's a that's a thing that's going on over there. I don't think one in a thousand Americans can articulate what the who the rebels care about. That's a totally regional problem that America's like, wow, we're just going to have to keep on lobbying missiles at those who the rebels because they're in rebellion rebellion against who? What what what interest do we have in the rebellion being waged by these people you call the who? These and the answer is Iran and does America have any interest in getting into a war with Iran? No, the Israeli government has an interest in toppling the Iranian regime because they're afraid that they're going to get nuclear weapons and nuke Israel. That's the answer to that question. And so like, you know, every every try every effort to gain some like, you know, to get us into a conflict Iran is like, okay, what we need what is Israel needs is for the Iranian government to be toppled. They do not care about any other portion of the equation. They're like, oh, well, you know, America look, you've been pretty good, but we'll just get along with those Chinese people or those Russians. If your country is destroyed, we'll go and we'll blackmail, you know, Chinese diplomats or whatever, we'll be fine. We understand the ways of the world. We've been we've been manipulating things long enough. But we will not tolerate a nuclear Iran. We need somebody else to go fight that war because that's we don't do stuff like that. You understand? We get you to kill people for us and then and then you get blamed and you get your country destroyed. The whole entire point is for us to live. You understand? And so revolver takes this line that's like, oh, you know, we're we're all about not having the war you see. Which is why, you know, we support these superior means of antagonizing the conflict in the region. And it's really irritating. And I'm willing to tolerate it from Trump if that's what we've got to do to be president. Fine. Whatever. But don't tell me, you know, oh, yeah. Well, you know, things are not looking good over that. This is a revolver quoting from bad ombre, a Twitter account. President Trump exerted pressure on Iran by pulling out of a flawed nuclear deal strengthening economic relations with our partners, instituting hard-hitting sanctions and deterrence through strength and strategic ambiguity. The result was reaching the precipice of good faith diplomatic negotiations for the first time in decades. Joe Biden enables the Iranian regime with billions in cash payments, squanders resources by foolishly fanning the flames of endless conflict in Israel and Ukraine and broadcast weakness to the world through indecisiveness and disasters with draws. The results are the unnecessary deaths of American military service members and an increasingly unstable world. This is the difference between an America first and an America last foreign policy. Back to revolver. Here's the truth. Unless we vote out Biden along with the war mongering rhino's, they give neo-con's like Nikki Haley the boot. We're on a one way path to an endless cycle of forever wars. The choice for 2024 is crystal clear. What's it going to be? War piece. Raise your hand if you'd like this back and it's a bunch of stuff with Donald Trump. And so, you know, yeah, I'm all for Trump. All for getting rid of Biden. No argument you're going to find for me. Yeah. But I had to tell you, I don't like this nonsense idea that what we need to do is deal with that. We need to get rid of that Iranian government in a more efficient manner than Joe Biden is. You know, give the money. Yeah, don't give them any money. Let's stop giving everybody money. Let's cut off Iran and Israel at the same time with the same stroke and the same pen. What do you say? Oh, no, you can't do that, right? Why would you? And so, actually, before I go to that one, I'll probably pull up this. Let's go pull up this one. There's a guy whose name's Reed Hoffman. And Reed Hoffman is a guy. He co-founded LinkedIn. That's a social network, ostensibly for like, you know, what do you call professionals? It's like a work. It's like Facebook for work. It's like, no, I'm not on Facebook. I'm on LinkedIn. It's okay. Don't worry, boss. Okay. And so you look at this guy and you realize you take one. Look at him and you're like, oh, right. So you, you're a monster and you molest children. You look at him. You're like, yeah, obviously. And then you find out that like, yeah, as a matter of fact, he went to he went to Epstein's Island. Democrat billionaire Reed Hoffman who has been funding Nikki Haley's running for the GOP nomination has been outed as a visitor to the child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein's private island, little St James better known as peto island. The Democrat mega donor. LinkedIn founder was reported to be considering funding to throndescentus purely to try and thwart Trump's nomination nine months ago. He ultimately decided to back Haley giving a quarter million dollars to the pro Haley SFA fund Inc. The super PAC has been asked if it would accept money given, accept the money given Hoffman status as an active Biden supporter prior to the donation. It confirmed that it would Hoffman has now been outed for visiting Epstein's Island in 2014 long after Epstein's conviction for procuring a girl below the age of 18 for prostitution and even arranged to stay at the Manhattan townhouse with a financial abused many of his victims. Hoffman admitted to the Wall Street Journal that quote by lending my association, I helped Epstein's reputation and thus delayed justice for his survivors. He claimed his last interaction with the infected sex offender was in the year 2015. Haley is coming under pressure to return Hoffman's money on social media from users, including Congressman Lance Guden. Hoffman is also known for having secretly begrolled E. Jean Carroll's civil case alleging that Trump raped her in 1995 or 1996. Carol initially claims she had been receiving no outside funding, but was not sanctioned by Bill Clinton appointed, I'm sorry, Bill Clinton appointed judge Lewis Kaplan when the truth came out Kaplan also ruled jurors could not be told about Hoffman's involvement in the case. Hoffman contributed more than $600,000 to the legal defense fund of being LLC otherwise known as fusing GPS, the company responsible for the creation of the steel dossier, which spread various false accusations of links between Trump and Russia. And so that's a tiny little bit of background on that fat pedophile child rapist piece of garbage named Reed Hoffman. You know what else is interesting about Reed Hoffman? Reed Hoffman also finance. What's the, I'm going to get a no, I'm going to get a new MIDI controller. You know, let me tell you something else about Reed Hoffman. What else he was financing? Yeah, you know what he's financing finance the unite to write lawsuit. He paid for Roberta Kaplan and this cabal of, you know, legal terrorists to harass me and my associates for the better part of a decade. And, and they lost, right? They accused us of having a racially motivated violin conspiracy. They failed to prove that, but they still got millions of dollars because the jury didn't like what we were saying. So they found a slide over harassment. And the lawyers who've been paid good money by my co-defendants didn't bother to bring that up at the recent oral arguments before the four circuit court of appeals. That's going to be left to me. I'm the only one who's got the brains to do that because those guys are not on our side. So that is one story. Reed Hoffman, finances Roberta Kaplan, he's a pedophile, and he's a Democrat, mega donor. And over here at Reuters, we got a story, white male, NYU law student seeks class action status in bias case. The anonymous plaintiff in a race and sex discrimination lawsuit challenging the selection process for New York University School of Laws, flagship law reviews seeking class action status for all current and former white heterosexual male students who hope to participate. John Doe is the plaintiff is called in court filing. So on Wednesday, as to federal judge to certify the case as a class action before May 10th, when the law reviews writing competition begins to determine membership for the following academic year. Student editor and other law review staff positions are prestigious credentials they can open doors to sought after legal jobs. Doe's lawsuit filed in October and Manhattan federal court claims NYU law review gives preference to women in minorities in violation of title six and title nine, which prohibit race and sex discrimination and education programs that receive federal phones. A judge in November allowed him to proceed with the case anonymously for now. NYU has hired prominent attorney a prominent attorney by the name of Roberta Kaplan, Heckler and Fink. Roberta Kaplan of Kaplan, Heckler and Fink. Yes, that's right. Her lawsuit has the name think in it because this is cartoon clown world. Kaplan, who is in federal court in Manhattan on Friday representing Eugene Carroll and her lawsuit against defamation trial against former Republican president Donald Trump could not be reached for comment. An NYU law spokesperson declined to comment on Doe's class action bit. Well, that's interesting. I'd say Roberta Kaplan is all about stopping race discrimination. She's all about that stuff unless you're you know, unless you're a white heterosexual bail in which case she's like, Oh, how do I destroy this person? Because I'm a monster and I hate humanity. And why you use motion to dismiss the cases due January 29th, those are school called Doe's suit baseless in a motion opposing expedited discovery. Doe is represented by America first legal and organization headed by former Trump advisor Steven Miller, conservative lawyer Jonathan Mitchell, who unsuccessfully sued both NYU law review and the Harvard Law Review in 2018 for discrimination is also on Doe's legal team. Mitchell did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday. Doe's lawsuit is the first legal challenge to law review diversity policies following you as Supreme Court's June decision that prohibited race conscious college and university admissions. It asked the court to join the NYU law review from considering race sexual orientation or gender identity when selecting editors or staffers. According to the motion for class action status figures from the American bar association show there are 96 white men in NYU laws, current class of first year students. Doe claims that most of those students are likely intended to likely intend to apply to the law review. The case is John Doe v. New York University, US District for the Southern District of New York, one colon two, three dash CV dash 10515 for Doe, uh, whatever, you get the idea. Those are the fucking. Oh my god, I'm so sorry. This is surreal politics. I'm sorry for the F ladies and gentlemen, whoops. Let's give them a helicopter, right? Okay. Yeah, I should totally be tossed out of a helicopter for doing that. I'm very sorry, but I got upset because this cabal of monsters, they're trying to ruin the country. Two one seven six eight eight one four three three. You like to be on the program and the more you talk to less, I have to. So please do give us a call. I should mention, uh, you know, uh, you guys remember Dave in New York, Dave in New York used to call in through show. He was, uh, he was a free talk live caller and then he followed me over here because, you know, he's Dave and he stalks people. Now Dave's a good guy. I'm just kidding about the stalking. I actually, uh, I miss Dave's calls. I wish that David call in here again. Uh, we used to have a lot of fun talking today. And it's not just me who likes him. Dave's actually got a fan. He's got a fan who sends me letters every once in a while. And he hopes Dave that you've got all the straw battery vapes that you can handle. Okay. So Dave, why don't you give us a call to one seven six eight eight one four three three Tony soprano says on a live broadcast joy read was caught on a hot mic criticizing Joe Biden for starting another f in war clip here. I'll get that for sure 14 dollars and 33 cents from Tony soprano libertariats as they are probably referring to the American dual citizens that F a F O what's F a F O I gotta look that one up. Um, on October 7th, what did they F a F O on October 7th? That means, uh, oh, I see F around and find out I get it now. That's pretty smart. Okay. Yeah. So they F around find out on October 7th because there are a bunch of dual citizens living in Israel. They're like, oh, go over to America. Go pick up that citizenship thing so that, you know, if you ever get, you know, said if you ever get arrested in a foreign country, we'll get the United States to ransom you, you know, and then if you get, you know, if you commit a crime in America, just come over and live in Israel and we'll let them take you. It's good deal being a dual citizen. You get whatever you want as long as as long as it's not what I want, you know, two one seven six eight eight one four three three. You like to be on the program and I'm going to tell the less I have to. So please do give us a call. And so what's going on here at Goi MTV? Are you guys? What's going on? I guess at Goi MTV doesn't work. It just doesn't work. You know, which is a shame because you got great guys over there. Oh, anyway, not and I can do about it, kids, not and I can do about it. And so Roberta Kaplan is financed by Reed Hoffman, Reed Hoffman, rapes children, and Roberta Kaplan, Suz Donald Trump for rape, helps Andrew Cuomo get away with rape. She suits us for racial animus and then she helps, you know, universities enact their racial animus through through their official policies, you see. Because she's a criminal who's financed by pedophiles and she's trying to destroy America because that's her idea of a good time. You know, they asked her, you know, there was this they put together this fake documentary, right? This little work of fiction that they played on HBO. No accident. And they asked her during a thing, hey, Christopher Catwell said he wanted to save the country and she's like, and what do you have to say to that? And she's like, good luck. Which was very sarcastic. Roberta Kaplan does not want me to have good luck at all. It was very clear that she didn't want the country to be safe. And what she actually meant by that was I'm destroying this country. You go ahead and you try me, go ahead. We will be destroyed too. It's the whole entire point of what I'm doing. That's why the pedophiles pay me the big bucks. You understand? You know what we got to do? You guys got to all figure out the Manero thing and become millionaires. And then I'm just going to do a tour based podcast that I live off of Manero. Okay. And then I'm going to tell you what I really think about these people, you know. I'm just a good old days. You know. But I was like, I'm nobody. Nobody's paying attention. I can say whatever I want. You know. Yeah. So whatever. I got to strike on my YouTube channel. We back doing it again in 30 days. Whatever. If I told you what I think about that, I'd be on my way to prison fellow. Forget about the forget about the self-imposed speech constraints on this show. Read Hoffman's hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein financing lawsuits against against Donald Trump, me and defending New York University's racial discrimination through a capitol. Yeah. Well, you know, my honest opinion about that kids is we all better vote harder. Yeah. We better go and show up in court and make strong arguments, fellas. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. Ah, this fallen sick world dominated by chaos and wickedness that we liven, man. A fan of the era asks a Kaplan prosecutor Trump. No Kaplan sued Trump on behalf of eG and Carol. You should, you should look that up. EG and Carol was recently rewarded like 83 million dollars from Donald Trump. Because even though the jury did not find that Trump raped her, they found him liable for sexual assault, right? So EG and Carol gets on the stand, swears on a bible and says, I do swear to tell the truth, the whole truth doesn't about the truth. So help me God. And if I you better block me up for perjury because that's what it is to crime. It's a felony to accuse someone of a crime in a courtroom and not be telling the truth. You see now the jury was certain that EG and Carol was lying about being raped by Donald Trump. That was obvious because who in their right mind would have sex with EG and Carol, first of all. And then secondly, because EG and Carol, not only is she filthy and repulsive, but her story was absolutely nonsense. She's like, yeah, I was in a department store. I don't remember what year it was, but then Donald Trump came in, bent me over and forcibly penetrated me because he's that kind of guy just runs around raping girls just goes to a department store, sees somebody in the dressing room and breaks them. That was the story. And so the jury's like, that's obviously nonsense, you crazy person because you know, on top of the fact that it's just implausible. You never said anything about it until you published a book with the claim. Then you're like, oh, yeah, yeah. Now that I'm publishing a book, I want you to buy the book where I talk about being raped by Donald Trump. And then Donald Trump's like, hey, you crazy person. I didn't rape you. She's like, I'm suing you for defamation because these lawyers were a burden of capital. It's like, why don't you sue this guy for you? This other guy to pay for it. And she's like, yeah, go ahead, do that. And she's like, okay, then I will go do that. And so they sued for defamation, rape and sexual assault. And the jury did not find Trump liable for rape. So the jury didn't believe the story of Eugene Carroll, but they found him liable for sexual sexual assault and defamation. It's very similar to what happened in Virginia, right? They did not find us liable for what we were accused of. They said, no, obviously there's no racially motivated by own conspiracy here, but screw you guys. We're going to hold you liable for something else. Actually, that's not how the law works. You see, it's a violation of your due process rights to find you liable for something you were accused of. It's kind of the whole point of having a legal system as a matter of fact. That's why you have things like written, you know, complaints and then responses to the complaints. That's why you have indictments, right? That's why you have discovery. The whole entire point is, what am I accused of? What do I have to defend against? You can't find me liable for something I wasn't accused of. It's the whole point of having a legal system. You're not going to do that just run around shooting people. It's a lot easier, but expensive. So the jury was like, why hate Donald Trump, but you know, he definitely didn't rape this maniac. So what are we going to do? Well, you'll find him look sexual assault, whatever. His, his present, you know, Donald Trump being around is basically sexual assault, right? And so they gave her millions of dollars and jump was like, jump was like, hey, look, he filed emotion to overturn the verdict. And he's like, well, look, they suit me for rape. She didn't find them. They didn't find me liable for rape. Found me liable for sexual assault. She went in there, said, I forcibly penetrated her in the dressing room. They didn't believe her. So how are we going to find me liable for sexual assault? And the judge is like, well, you know, sexual assault rape. It's the same thing, you know, so we're just going to say it's the same. I know that there's different laws or whatever, but you know, it's the courtroom. What do we care about laws? It's Americans, 2024. Get with the times, Donald Trump. Who cares what the law says? I'm a judge. I tell you what the law is shut up. And then they, you know, then they had to figure out the damages thing. So yeah, so now it's 83 something billion dollars. And each and Carol's like, you know what? I'm going to spend all of that undefeating Donald Trump in the next election. And so it's a compulsory campaign contribution to Joe Biden is what it is. Which is great. It's a good idea. If you're Joe Biden, that's a great idea. If you're like a voter, that sucks. You know, if you're not a monster, that's not a good idea at all. 217-688-1433. You like to be on the program and when you tell the less I have to, so please give us a call. And if you don't call it, then I'm going to end the show pretty soon. But you've got moments to, moments remain. And they're not, you know, it's not limited to the lawsuits, right? Like the whole country is just they're just destroying it, right? They're like, you know what they're going to do? They're just going to turn the FBI into an affirmative action program. This is a story over it in New York post. DEI hires pushed on to the FBI or putting the country's safety at risk for the sake of being woke by Miranda divine. An alarming deterioration in recruitment standards for the FBI has been exposed in a recent report delivered to the House Judiciary Committee by an alliance of retired and active duty agents and analysts. Diversity, equity and inclusion requirements pushed by FBI director Christopher Ray, the scumbag who is in charge of that scam when they broke my guard down in 2020. Have degraded recruitment standards in all areas, including physical fitness, illicit drug use, financial irregularities, mental health, and full-time work experience and integrity. And pose a threat to the FBI's ability to protect America from harm, say the authors. The report sides cases of new agents who are so fat and unfit that they can't even pass the new relaxed standards for fitness, who are illiterate and need remedial English lessons. Who don't want to work weekends or after hours have serious disabilities or mental health issues and quote create drama. It's fantastic, great, wonderful. You guys run around with firearms, enforcing whatever it is you think the law is today. The FBI is no longer recruiting the best and brightest to be special agents, but selecting candidates based on race, gender, and or sexual orientation. The alliance of anonymous FBI reformers includes senior and former senior former executives and agents from the counterintelligence and counterterrorism branches who warned that the FBI today's FBI quote, lacks the fortitude and skills warranted to defeat existential threats. And if the current direct trajectory of the FBI special agent recruitment and selection continues using DEI is this primary and sole measure. Our homeland security efforts will be significantly hampered. I guess that depends on what the goal is, doesn't it? An increasing number of lower quality candidates described by one source is breadcrumbs because they were rejected by other federal law enforcement agencies are applying to become FBI agents and send our being recruited because they quote satisfy the FBI's priority to meet diversity, equity, and inclusion mandates. Lying in the face of raise boasts to Congress last year that recruitment numbers are soaring, especially in red states. The report finds that the FBI special agent hiring numbers are down likely due to the decline in the nation's trust in the FBI and a corresponding decrease in the number of individuals interested in applying for the to the FBI for employment. A former senior counterintelligence agent involved in with writing the report said controversies engulfing the FBI in the Trump era have had the perverse effect of attracting recruits who quote want to be agents of social change versus protecting the country. And you might notice that those two goals are in conflict, of course. You can't do both of those things. A former senior that's what I just said, recruitment has become self destructive and is setting up the FBI for a generational failure. Another former agent who helped draft the report said, why are we funding a new FBI headquarters if you're hiring second rate people? The report is written as if it were an official FBI intelligence product with code names given the sources and sub sources who anonymously provided firsthand knowledge of FBI recruitment and selection practices. They include instructors and counselors at the FBI Academy in Quantico, Virginia application coordinators and assessors from the FBI field offices across the country. Supervisors and executives on the FBI headquarters in Washington DC. They reveal a farcical situation with new recruits veteran supervisor special agent Sierra 72 just qualified a black female applicant because she was more than 50 pounds overweight using the FBI's body fat indexing could not pass the physical fitness test. But FBI HQ ordered Sierra 72 to push the candidate through the recruitment process. Other supervisors say a high percentage of candidates fail, the mandatory fitness test despite the fact that the standards have been relaxed. They simply quit in the middle of the 1.5 mile run goes the quote, one veteran agent who works as a recruitment coordinator code name Sierra 87 said the drug policy for new agents has been liberalized to include applicants who had a lifestyle of using drugs. That's right. A candidate who was arrested and fought with police officers was not disqualified nor are candidates who driving under the influence convictions or people with documented mental illness. That's it that explains a lot. Oh my god, that's a bunch of truff by trying to overthrow the government. The president just wasted an insurrection against his own government. Are you out of your mind? Yeah, but that's I'm diverse. Shut up. You neuro typical monster nor are candidates who lie during their recruitment process. Sierra 72 disqualified a special agent applicant because their only work experience is working two years as a coffee shop barista and having a bachelor's degree in art history. But FBI HQ orders Sierra 72 to push the applicant through. So ladies and gentlemen, if you ever get a bear cat in front of your house, a bunch of guys with AR 15s come break your door down and some coffee barista with a degree in art history says put them up. You'll know that you are participating in a diversity program. Sierra 23 is special agent for four years encounter terrorism observed that most new agents quote disappeared during the day go home earlier never want to work late for after hours operations. Sierra 23 does not trust most of the agents with his or her life since they have questionable competence tactical abilities and work ethic. Sierra 22 said one applicant recently rejected by a local police department and one who was a long term unemployed gamer were pushed through F through FBI HQ for non special agent positions despite objections from the field office. All the recruits have been given remedial English classes because they're not capable of writing basic reports in a coherent manner and often failed to utilize proper capitalization punctuation and structure sentences properly. In one case, training agent Sierra 11 quote advised a new agent that his or her writing skills needed improvement in that the new agent needed to pay attention to detail. The new agent complained to the supervisor that Sierra 11 was too difficult. Complain to the supervisor that Sierra 11 was too difficult and expecting too much. Yeah, you know, he's not. Why is he expecting so much of me to be an FBI agent? I show up. I put in my eight hours and I go home. I don't want to hear any other scrap that I need to capitalize the first ladder in a sentence. I'm done with you people. You bang it. That's why supremacy. A family on minority recruit could not compose a simple FD 302, the standard FBI interview report said Sierra 79, a criminal investigator of four decades. Quote the agent never made a case or wrote an affidavit and had to be pulled along to support investigations and could not be trusted in court. Well, you'd be trusted in court just fine. The whole one time you just have to trust them to do the right things, right? Hey, you go on to stand, you call that guy a racist and you should be like, yeah, no problem. I'll do that. I'll do that all days. The whole point of the FBI. During the agent's probationary period, her supervisor went up the chain of command to request that her employment be terminated, but was told we need minority female agents. An FBI agent recruit stuttered and appeared to have Tourette syndrome or other tictus order that hindered his or her ability to communicate said Sierra 32, a veteran supervisor at Academy who wondered how this recruit would function in a high threat hostile environment. Ivy League graduates were being hired fresh out of college and placed in high level positions to do strategic planning responsible for establishing policy procedures and goals with counterproductive recruiters are required to host diversity applicant recruitment events based on race, gender, and sexual orientation. Straight white males may not attend if a recruiter chose not to attend a pride parade or fly the pride flag the recruiter would most likely be removed immediately. The report urges the House Judiciary Committee to one or ninety day audit of the FBI's recruitment practices to introduce legislation to strengthen the OF of office for FBI agents and to call on directorate to testify before Congress over whether he is quote willfully lying to conceal significant deficiencies and quote in recruitment or has been misinformed by subordinates. A spokesman for committee chairman Jim Jordan said the panel was evaluating the report quote we are thankful that these brave FBI officials have come forward with this report and describe some of the ridiculous things that are happening at the Bureau. We will continue to work with these officials so we can further implement the proper legislative changes. The authors want to remain anonymous because Roberta Kaplan will sue them with money from the pedophile read hoppin that's not actually written at the New York Post. The authors want to remain anonymous because those still serving know they will be crushed like whistleblowers before them says one of the authors. And so ladies and gentlemen your president is fallen asleep at a wheel and you might take some comfort in that because you actually wouldn't want him to be in charge probably. And you know and the FBI is an affirmative action program which doesn't care if it's if it's special agents are on drugs or mentally ill as a matter of I'm sorry I didn't mean to say they don't care. They care very much and they prefer it that way. You see if you're fat and addicted to drugs and mentally ill there's a pretty good possibility that you're transgender which case you're like the diversity you know you straighten the whole thing out for your whole department that way. So we'll make you you know we'll put you in charge. Look out Christopher Ray they're going to put Emily Gossensky in your job. Pettifiles they fund you know cabals of Jewish lesbians to go sue every decent person in the country when the money gets caught up it goes to Joe Biden and then Joe Biden gets us into a wall to run because you know there's not nearly enough at that going on in the world. But you know I'm just going to straighten it a lot I promise. Oh my god. Why don't you tell you what can you do me a favor send me three extra shackles. That's that's all I'm asking you just send me three extra shackles. Christopher can't well that's less than eight uh syruple teased.com slash donate edgy chris is my cash tag but that cash app thing gives and go.com slash spm you just go over there. Three extra shackles. That's all I'm asking for okay because you know read hop and he gives them the millions of dollars and they try to sue me and it's a pain in the neck. But fortunately you know they're not coming after that money yet so you want to give me some money now be a fine time to do it. You know they if they get they they win an appeal and you know might be harder to give me money later on I had I like you know yeah I'm not going to say but you know we'll straighten it all out one way or another and you know worst case scenario there are no more arguments to be made. Well what are we going to do then Stefan model you less of a boast warrior yeah well you know that positive will be exist but we're going to do everything on our power to avoid that right so thank you very much for tuning in to surreal politics ladies and gentlemen do this every Monday 9 30 PM US Eastern time if you're smart enough to give me 10 bucks a month that's real politics.com.slaid join then you can join us for the member show on Wednesday failing that we'll be back cursing up a storm on Friday for the uncensored production I do hope that you will join us for all of these things because we're having a blast when we're not like hiding under our beds cowering about world water so do tune in go send me some shackles three extra shackles yeah just three of them okay we'll be back we'll figure it all out. Trouble help us out find a little bit you know I'm not to see you know obviously I right laugh get better hit them by them you know maybe steps kids maybe stuff how about the guy who just got taken to the cleaners by these little things because friends the United States if he's bad at them then maybe he'll give them some trouble what do you think do you think that might help I think it would have better be better to go on now better the guy who got cleaned out by that president the guy who's finally as far as right we